At Display Week the best way to get started is the Monday
seminars , which provide a technical foundation on a wide variety of subjects
that are also featured prominently in the symposium and exhibitions.
I started my day at
the seminar titled "Issues, Insights, and Interactions on Touch HMI,"
jointly presented by Gary Barrett from Touch International and Geoff Walker
from Intel. Both Gary and Geoff are well known and highly experienced
experts in the field of touch technology, and lately both have been on the
forefront of the projected capacitive (p-cap) wave, making bold predictions on
the commercial advancement of the technology as well as acting as keen observers
and contributors to its success. This year they provided us with their
insights on several key topics such as ITO replacement materials, the return of
the pen/stylus and the potential value of "hover" mode, the future
direction of coatings and the possibility of plastic top glass layers
returning, limitations that still exist in p-cap today, and what the future
holds for p-cap applications.
On the subject of pens and hover, there is a lot of interest
in returning to pen-based interactions, because of the very high information
content on today's portable devices, and I was surprised to learn that today's
latest p-cap systems are so well tuned that they can be activated in many cases
by an actual lead tipped pencil, which means that the opportunity for a wide
family of narrow-tipped, low-cost passive styluses is back again. Of course pen
computing is not new, having first come on the scene back in the 1990s, and
anyone who has owned a PDA is familiar with this style of interaction.
But lately the iPhone led the way in the 'finger-not-pen' debate and pen-based
UIs seemed to fade away. However, I've always found pointing devices more
useful and accurate than finger touch myself, and my wife uses a passive stylus
on her Surface tablet most of the time, so I welcome the return of the pen.
What struck me as part of this discussion is how dynamic
this technical area continues to be, with many key areas for research and
development still open, including ITO replacement materials and harsh
environment performance. While p-cap is good, it continues to prove
Geoff's old adage that no touch solution is ever perfect. There are
several good areas for innovation and competitive differentiation due to both
performance and cost. During the audience questions, I asked specifically
about the future for salt spray/water immunity in commercial large screen p-cap
applications and was pleased to hear Gary answer that today this vulnerability
can be effectively managed through firmware and may be eliminated in the near
future. We've already seen at least one company commercially advertising
salt water-immune p-cap, so, between this performance area and the return of
the passive stylus we may be closing in on the "perfect" touch
technology after all -- OK, not quite yet but I'm just sayin'... . – Stephen Atwood,
Executive Editor
No comments:
Post a Comment